MARATTO

article · Frontiers in Medicine

Rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease: diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound compared to chest high resolution computed tomography

Abstract

Introduction: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) affects up to 60% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) remains the gold standard for diagnosis; however, it involves radiation exposure. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a safe and accessible tool, but it has not yet been validated for ILD diagnosis in RA. Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center, cross-sectional study including patients followed for RA. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, history of heart failure, acute cardiac decompensation, respiratory symptoms within the last 3 months, and pneumonia within the past month. All included patients underwent both LUS and chest HRCT. The diagnostic performance of LUS was assessed using HRCT as the reference standard. Results: A total of 73 patients were included (18 men and 55 women), with a mean age of 55 ± 12 years. The mean Disease Activity Score (DAS28-ESR) was 3.47 ± 1.40. Chest HRCT identified ILD in 28.8% of patients. According to the semi-quantitative ultrasound score, interstitial involvement was detected in 21.9% of patients. The sensitivity of LUS was 59.1%, and the specificity was 94.1%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.813. The optimal cutoff was 5 B-lines, yielding a sensitivity of 63.6% and a specificity of 94.1%. Discussion: LUS demonstrated good diagnostic performance for ILD detection in RA patients, with high specificity. These findings suggest that LUS may represent a useful screening tool to identify patients requiring further evaluation with HRCT.

Research topics

  • Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1774934

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.