article · medRxiv
Abstract Background Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains a major public health concern across low- and middle-income countries in the Global South. Early detection through community-based screening of asymptomatic individuals has been identified as a critical strategy for reducing the disease burden. Despite this, the absence of accessible, automated population screening tools continues to impede implementation at scale. This study investigates the screening potential of integrating electrocardiography (ECG) and phonocardiography (PCG) for the early detection of RHD in asymptomatic schoolchildren. Methods The dataset was obtained as part of an ambulatory screening initiative conducted across multiple school sites in rural areas of Ethiopia. It comprised ECG and PCG recordings from 611 asymptomatic schoolchildren aged 10 to 20 years. A comprehensive set of time–frequency, visibility graph and non-linear features were extracted from both signal modalities. These features were subsequently evaluated using machine learning models to assess their utility in the automated screening of early RHD. Results The best model achieved an average 10-folds cross-validation scores on sensitivity, positive-predictive-value and F1-score of 59.6%, 63.6% and 60.8%, respectively for multimodal ECG and PCG signals. Whereas separate evaluation of ECG showed an F1-score of 61.1% and PCG achieved 23.5%. Key features included the T-wave, the area under the QRS complex, and entropy measures derived from beat visibility graphs in the ECG. In addition, visibility graph features from multi-band S1 and S2 heart sound segments, along with MFCC coefficients from the PCG, were also relevant. However, PCG alone performed poorly and did not show improved results over the ECG features. Conclusion Although auscultation is key clinical diagnosis tool in symptomatic RHD, combined PCG with ECG features does not enhance asymptomatic RHD detection using the ECG modality alone.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.64898/2026.05.12.26352939
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.