MARATTO

article · Sustainable Futures

Revisiting the carbon footprint of cryptocurrency trading: A granger causality approach

20257 citationsOpen accessKwara State University

Abstract

The environmental impact of cryptocurrencies has attracted increasing scrutiny, largely due to the high energy consumption of blockchain networks. However, empirical research on the causal relationship between cryptocurrency trading activity and carbon emissions remains scarce. This study addresses this gap by analysing the dynamic interplay between cryptocurrency trading and CO₂ emissions for Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Binance Coin, using monthly data from January 2015 to September 2024. Employing the Toda-Yamamoto augmented Granger causality approach, we apply logarithmic transformations to ensure data stationarity and address integration and endogeneity concerns. Our results reveal a bidirectional Granger causality between Bitcoin trading and CO₂ emissions, suggesting a feedback loop between market activity and environmental impact. For Ethereum, we find a similar albeit weaker bidirectional causality from trading to emissions, while no significant causal link is detected for Binance Coin, likely reflecting its more energy-efficient consensus mechanism. These findings highlight the disproportionate environmental burden of proof-of-work cryptocurrencies and underscore the need for targeted regulatory responses. We recommend the adoption of carbon-sensitive crypto policies, such as mandatory energy usage disclosures and incentives for transitioning to sustainable consensus mechanisms. This study advances the environmental finance literature by providing robust empirical evidence on the links between digital asset markets and carbon emissions.

Research topics

  • Market Dynamics and Volatility
  • Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
  • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100995

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.