MARATTO

article · IEEE Access

Review on Approaches of Federated Modeling in Anomaly-Based Intrusion Detection for IoT Devices

202414 citationsOpen accessUmaru Musa Yar'Adua University

Abstract

The novelty of Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising alternative to centralized machine learning systems in the context of Anomaly-Based Intrusion Detection Systems (AIDS) deployed on Internet of Things (IoT) devices. Unlike traditional centralized models, FL allows on-device model training and updates, reducing privacy concerns and issues like single points of failure and high false alarm rates (FAR). This approach, termed ’Fed-AIDS,’ offers a more secure and efficient solution. However, the development of Fed-AIDS models faces challenges related to limited training data and the diverse nature of IoT datasets. Additionally, FL’s decentralized nature introduces weight divergence issues arising from non-Independently and Identically Distributed (non-IID) clients. To address these challenges and optimize Fed-AIDS modeling, interdisciplinary research efforts are vital. The primary objective of this study is to conduct an up-to-date review by adopting a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach to analyze existing studies of Fed-AIDS modeling procedures for IoT devices. Data from the published studies were retrieved from Scopus database, which covered major publishers like IEEE, Elsevier and others. Specifically, our review conducted from the following Fed-AIDS perspectives: workflow and tools, training dataset, complexities of non-IID data in Fed-AIDS models, classification tasks, aggregation tasks, and model validation metrics. Based on the research findings, the study highlights a series of challenges and proposes potential solutions to stand in future research in Fed-AIDS modeling, aiming to advance the field of IoT device security.

Research topics

  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Smart Grid Security and Resilience

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1109/access.2024.3369915

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.