peer review
1.This abstract is WATERY!Elements of quality abstract is missing such as Introduction of general problems, study objectives, methods of data collection, data analysis packages and presentation of results format, conclusion and recommendation.2. Avoid using "We" the readers already knows that few people conducted the research 3.The absratct DID NOT MENTION ONLY ONE FIGURE to back the results.4. No conclusion 5. Recommendation not clearly aligned with the objectives
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.32388/cu2yef
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.