peer review
I have made all my comments on the supplementary data section. In summary, this paper needs to be redone. The issues highlighted can be addressed. The authors should also proofread before sending it back for review.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.32388/nm1cy8
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.