peer review
The ambivalence showing why the manuscript is not shown.This is a weakness of the paper, making contextualization difficult.2. The research issue is weak.It has to be sharpened with relevant statistics showing the negative externalities of the situation in Ethiopia already.3. The literature requires refinement, where similarities and differences from previous research are shown.This will then provide a context for the value addition the manuscript is bringing to the fora.4. Discussions with extant literature are not sufficient, and therefore, reasonable conclusions would be difficult to reach. 5.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.32388/7h6tut
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
