peer review
The conclusion is vague and does not send a specific message.Results: The repetition of results already shown in the table may not be necessary.Discussion: A few typos were observed.Please recheck the interpretation of the results of logistic regression.The discussion should have been an examination of the factors identified as important following statistical analysis as well as a comparative review with the results of other studies.Please improve on it. Conclusion:The recommendations are not drawn from the results of the study.Limitations: The study focused on a specific town, limiting generalizability to broader contexts.Other unexplored factors may also contribute to incomplete vaccination.Overall, the subject matter is topical, and the authors have made a good attempt.However, the quality of writing can be greatly improved upon.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.32388/2xvh3v
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
