Review of: "Customary Land Tenure, Mining, and the Development Question: Insights From a Transitional State"

Abstract

The abstract is clear in explanation, but the paper itself is not as explicit.For instance, the abstract states that "the study reveals the evolution of land practices in contrast to static mining and tenure laws, often rooted in colonial legacies" -but this is not explicit in the body of the paper.Furthermore, the abstract is generic on the methodology used for the paper.In addition, the abstract states that it used "a comprehensive desk research approach", but in the Methodology section, it says "In-depth interviews were conducted with 88 households and key informants" -was this a desk research or did it involve field work?The abstract does not say anything on key findings.