MARATTO

article · Scientific Reports

Reversible data hiding for electronic patient information security for telemedicine applications

2026Open accessSIMAD University

Abstract

Telemedicine workflows require the secure transmission of medical images while preserving diagnostic integrity. We propose a Reversible Data Hiding in Encrypted Images (RDH‑EI) scheme tailored for telemedicine that couples (i) a Generation of Encryption Parameters (GEP) mechanism to derive per‑block embedding controls from a data‑hiding key and (ii) a two‑level Least Significant Bit (LSB) strategy that provides separable payload extraction and exact image recovery. Images are first encrypted using AES‑CTR with a unique nonce; GEP then produces block‑wise traversal orders, offsets, and parity masks used by Phase‑1 (odd blocks, parity‑of‑triples) and Phase‑2 (even blocks, serialized side‑information). The method supports three operating modes: payload‑only extraction, decrypt‑only viewing, and full, bit‑exact recovery when both keys are available. On a 90‑image test set (30 X‑rays, 30 MRIs, 30 CTs, all 512 × 512), the proposed approach achieves higher quality on directly decrypted images than representative baselines at Z = 16: PSNR 39.92 ± 0.41 dB (X‑ray), 37.78 ± 0.38 dB (MRI), and 38.27 ± 0.36 dB (CT), with SSIM 0.9784 ± 0.0021, 0.9694 ± 0.0023, and 0.9835 ± 0.0018, respectively. The recovered images are bit‑exact (PSNR = ∞). Encryption robustness is supported by near‑maximal entropy, high NPCR (> 99%), and UACI near 33%. These results indicate that the proposed GEP‑driven, two‑level embedding improves the payload-distortion trade‑off while retaining strict reversibility, making it suitable for secure medical‑image sharing in telemedicine.

Research topics

  • Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Advanced Authentication Protocols Security

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-39512-5

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.