MARATTO

article · BMC Oral Health

Retention of CAD-CAM locator retentive attachment insert in mandibular implant overdenture

20251 citationOpen accessFuture University in Egypt

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The continuous development in digital prosthodontics allowed the customization of attachments and retentive inserts which offers an easy and cheap solution for regular maintenance of locator overdentures during daily practice. The present study compared the change in retention values of the fully digitally manufactured custom-made locator attachment retentive insert with the ready-made ones after insertion, removal, and masticatory cycles. METHODS: A complete denture was constructed over a mandibular edentulous epoxy model. Two implants were inserted into the model between the laterals and canines following the prosthetically driven implant protocol. Locator retentive attachment inserts were digitally designed using free-form modeling software and milled from PEEK (Poly Ether Ether Ketone). After the pick-up of the ready- and custom-made retentive inserts, an insertion, removal, and masticatory cycles test simulating 1 year of patient usage was performed. The change in retention values was recorded at baseline, 6 months, and after one year of simulated clinical use. An independent sample t-test was used to compare the data between the two studied groups. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in retention values between the custom-made and ready-made locator inserts at baseline and after 6 months. (p = 0.001*). On the other hand, there was no significant difference in retention after 1 year of simulated use. (p = 0.083, NS) CONCLUSIONS: The custom-made milled locator retentive attachment insert can be used as an alternative to the ready-made one due to their comparable retention values after 1 year of simulated use.

Research topics

  • Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
  • Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Dental materials and restorations

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05434-3

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.