MARATTO

article · BMC Medical Ethics

Researchers experience and views on participants’ comprehension of informed consent in clinical trials in Malawi: a descriptive qualitative study

20241 citationOpen accessAddis Ababa University

Abstract

Most of the participants understand much of the information during subsequent visits as you keep reminding them since informed consent is an ongoing process. Existing relationship or trust between a participant and a researcher, may influence participants' decision and misguide their understanding on the purpose of the study. Adequate time should be allocated to informed consent discussions. Shortening the informed consent forms and having additional conversations with potential participants may help improve their understanding.

Research topics

  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01100-5

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.