MARATTO

article · IEEE Access

Reliability Modeling of Fault-Tolerant FPGA-Based Architectures in Space Applications for Soft and Hard Error Recovery

20242 citationsOpen accessAmerican University in Cairo

Abstract

FPGAs are currently being used in many applications due to their flexibility and re-programmability. Some of these applications operate in harsh environments. One such environment is space. Focusing on space applications, these FPGAs are subjected to soft and hard faults. For newer technology nodes, in addition to the harsh space environment, these errors are more severe. This paper investigates several fault-tolerant architectures to mitigate Single Event Upsets (SEUs), Double Event Upsets (DEUs), Triple Event Upsets (TEUs) as well as hard faults. Conventionally, for TEUs, seven copies of a module are required (7MR). Therefore, a modified 7MR architecture is studied along with two other architectures with six redundant modules: a modified 6MR architecture and a modified Triple Duplex architecture. Using Continuous Time Markov Chains (CTMCs), it is proven that, in many of the cases studied in this article, the modified Triple Duplex architecture has a higher reliability than the modified 7MR architecture. This is a counter-intuitive result. It is also proven that the modified 6MR architecture always has a lower reliability than the modified Triple Duplex architecture even though they both require six redundant modules. The ratio between the relative rates of SEUs, DEUs and TEUs plays an important role in determining the most reliable architecture. Furthermore, the Xilinx Vivado tool with the Kintex7, 7k410tfbg676 device is used to implement the modified 7MR and modified Triple Duplex voters to estimate the area and power consumed by these techniques.

Research topics

  • Radiation Effects in Electronics
  • Embedded Systems Design Techniques
  • VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1109/access.2024.3369585

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.