MARATTO

article · Next Materials

Ramp rate-controlled mineralogical evolution and multi-scale structure–property framework for arsenate removal in nanohematite-bearing clay ceramic water filters

2026Open accessKyambogo University

Abstract

Sintering kinetics govern phase evolution and structure–property relationships in clay-based ceramics, yet the influence of heating rate on mineralogical evolution and filtration performance remains poorly understood. Here, ferruginous clay ceramic water filters were used to develop a multi-scale process–structure–property framework linking sintering ramp rate to mineralogical restructuring, hematite crystallographic evolution, transport behaviour, and arsenate removal. The raw clay contained high Fe₂O₃ ( 28.22 wt . % ) and an intrinsic nanohematite phase ( RHPA = 18.26 % , D = 12.43 nm ), providing an in-situ iron oxide phase relevant to arsenate adsorption. Ramp rate regulated hematite abundance and crystallographic characteristics, while multi-criteria optimisation integrating porosity, transport performance, densification, structural integrity, and hematite reactivity identified an optimum ramp rate of ⁻ ¹ 4 ° C min ⁻ ¹ . Under these conditions, arsenate concentrations were reduced from µ ⁻ ¹ 22.70 ± 1.50 to 9.91 ± 0.34 µg L ⁻ ¹ ( 56.3 % removal), achieving compliance with WHO guidelines. Zeta potential measurements revealed a transition from a strongly negative surface charge in the raw clay ( − 32.1 ± 1.4 mV ) to a near-neutral charge in the optimised filter ( + 1.3 ± 0.2 mV ), consistent with arsenate adsorption occurring predominantly through inner-sphere interactions on hematite-bearing surfaces. The optimised filter retained 92.9 ± 2.6 % of its flexural strength after prolonged aqueous exposure, indicating good structural stability. These findings establish sintering ramp rate as a key design parameter governing the evolution and performance of ferruginous ceramic filtration materials.

Research topics

  • Clay minerals and soil interactions
  • Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Fecal contamination and water quality

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.nxmate.2026.102713

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.