MARATTO

article · Physica Scripta

Radiological assessment of commonly food crops in Southwestern Nigeria

20245 citationsOpen accessFederal University of Agriculture

Abstract

Abstract Natural radionuclides are present in food items at different levels and are influenced by factors like background radiation, climate, and agricultural practices. These radionuclides play a crucial role in humans' internal radiation exposure. Notably, radionuclides within the decay series 238 U and 232 Th as well as 40 K are significant concerns in radiation protection due to their prevalence and potential health risks. The activity concentrations of radionuclides 238 U, 232 Th, and 40 K in several food crops consumed within Lagos city in Nigeria were measured using gamma spectrometry. The concentrations of 238 U, 232 Th, and 40 K ranged from 0.90 to 55.30, BDL (Below Detection Limit) to 161.60 and 10.30 to 1075.20 Bqkg −1 , respectively. The average radionuclide activity concentrations are below the acceptable global level, or the worldwide average values set by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation in 2000 (UNSCEAR, 2000), which are 35, 30, and 400 Bqkg −1 for 238 U, 232 Th, and 40 K, respectively. The study calculated the annual effective dose for individuals consuming the studied food items, and the annual internal dose from ingesting was found to be 8.95 × 10 –04 μ Svy −1 . It’s noteworthy that this computed value is below the worldwide value of 0.32 mSv y −1 set for the public. Additionally, the excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) value was 3.13 × 10 −3 μ Svy −1 , which is within the world safe limit value (2.9 × 10 −4 μ Svy −1 ). Therefore, there is no potential radiological risk associated with the measured data.

Research topics

  • Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
  • Nuclear Physics and Applications
  • Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1088/1402-4896/ad5256

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.