MARATTO

article · Minia Journal of Medical Research

R1/ Assessment of Risk Factors in Patients Presented With symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis In Minia University Hospital

2024Open accessAin Shams University

Abstract

Background: Cerebrovascular stroke is the 1st leading cause of death and the third leading cause of disability.It&#039;s been reported that intracranial Stenosis (ICAS) accounted for 10% of all cerebral ischemic events worldwide. Finding out what variables put individuals with intracranial artery stenosis at risk was the driving force behind this study. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on all patients referred to Minia University hospital presented with symptomatic intracranial stenosis either presented with stroke or transient ischemic attack aged from 18 to 80 years old, both sexes, for one year duration. Results: Total number of patients was 168 .Patients with no ICAS represented 89 cases while 79 of cases had ICAS .The mean age of patients with ICAS was 62±12.9 years, Male gender represented in 52(65.8%) of cases with ICAS. Smokers with ICAS were 28(35.4%). According to comorbidities, hypertension and dyslipidemia were found in 52(65.8%) & 51(64.6%) of cases with ICAS respectively, diabetes found in 29(36.7%) of cases with ICAS , obesity found in 18(22.8%) and IHD found in 13(16.5%) of cases with ICAS. History of previous stroke presented in 27(34.2%) of cases. Median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was 15(14-15). Previous history of stroke were significantly higher among cases with ICAS than among cases without ICAS (p value <0.05). Conclusions: the most common risk factors associated with patient with ICAS were being male, Hypertension,dyslipidemia , diabetes and smoking respectively ,and previous history of cerebrovascular stroke is significantly found in patients presented with symptomatic ICAS than patients without ICAS

Research topics

  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/mjmr.2024.304402.1747

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.