article · NIU journal of educational research.
This conceptual paper compares the quality assurance systems in Nigerian and Finnish higher education. It X-rays the foundational patterns that determine their areas of divergence and proposes a conceptual framework for quality assurance that accommodates 21st-century competencies. A comparative conceptual analysis approach was employed to synthesise the existing literature, policy documents and institutional reports in this study. The approach was used to examine the historical, structural, and procedural dimensions of quality assurance in Nigeria and Finland's higher education systems. The study found a qualitative divide between the two systems. While Nigeria's compliance quality assurance system emphasises the need to address deficits in basic resources and standards, Finland's quality assurance system, built on trust, institutional autonomy, and a culture of continuous improvement, emphasises enhancement. The uniqueness of this study lies in the Contextually Adaptive Quality Assurance (CAQA) Framework. It provides a principled, flexible template for developing quality assurance systems that ensure quality in the development of essential 21st-century competencies, including critical thinking and collaboration. Keywords: Quality assurance, Higher education, comparative education, Finland, Nigeria
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.58709/niujed.v12i1.2409
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.