MARATTO

article · WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS

Public Health Spending and Health Outcomes: What Are the Strategic Implications for The SADC Region?

Abstract

A well-funded health system is essential to protect people from the financial burden of sickness and allows for efficient responses to public health concerns. It increases the capacity to provide early and preventative interventions, thus being cost-effective. The study objective is to evaluate the effect of public health spending on health outcomes. Specifically, the effect of public health spending on life expectancy at birth and infant mortality. The study utilised the autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) model to determine the link. The study incorporates economic growth, technological advancement, foreign aid and corruption as the moderating variables. The results established that government health spending spurs health outcomes by increasing life expectancy and reducing infant mortality rates. The study established that health outcomes are positively influenced by technological advancement, economic growth and foreign aid. Corruption negatively affects health outcomes. The study recommends strong budgetary support to the health sector, anti-corruption laws and pro-growth policies.

Research topics

  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Economic Growth and Productivity

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.37394/23207.2026.23.44

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.