MARATTO

article · Frontiers in Psychology

Psychological resource pathways to life satisfaction in South Africa and India: a cross-national pilot study with implications for employee resilience

Abstract

Introduction: Psychological resources are critical to employee well-being and are widely regarded as enabling resilient functioning in the face of uncertainty. Evidence from non-Western contexts, however, remains limited. This cross-national pilot study examined whether psychological resources, operationalized as a composite of mental well-being (WEMWBS), flourishing (Flourishing Scale), and work engagement (UWES-3), predicted life satisfaction (SWLS) directly and/or indirectly via perceived stress (PSS-4) among employees in South Africa and India. The findings are discussed in relation to their implications for employee resilience theory and resource-building practice. Methods: = 10), which were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis to explain statistical patterns. Results: = 0.782). Qualitative themes explained the resource-dominant pathway: in South Africa, Ubuntu-based meaning, complex family support, masculine help-seeking norms, and economic/infrastructure strain characterized the resource-dominant pathway; whereas in India, technology-sector pride and aspirational mobility offset AI-related job insecurity, urban infrastructure burdens, and family separation characterized the resource-dominant pathway. Discussion: The findings support resource-building interventions and motivate future testing of alternative mediators (e.g., meaningful work, positive affect, self-efficacy) through adequately powered longitudinal studies. The cross-country similarity suggests functional equivalence of mechanisms with culturally specific content.

Research topics

  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Workplace Health and Well-being

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1706890

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.