article · SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine
Male infertility contributes substantially to the global burden of infertility, accounting for approximately 30–50% of infertility cases either independently or in combination with female factors. This study examined the association between psychological distress and semen quality among Ghanaian men attending fertility clinics in Kumasi. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 286 men undergoing fertility evaluation at fertility clinics in Kumasi, Ghana. Anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, while perceived stress and sleep quality were assessed using standardised instruments. Semen volume, sperm concentration, motility, and morphology were evaluated using World Health Organization laboratory guidance. Associations were examined using Kruskal–Wallis tests and multivariable linear regression. Missing observations were handled using available-case analysis without imputation. Among 286 participants, 16.43% demonstrated some degree of anxiety symptoms, while 7.34% had depressive symptoms. Abnormalities were most frequent for sperm concentration (28.06%) and sperm motility (22.38%). Anxiety status was significantly associated with sperm concentration (χ² = 6.267, p = 0.044), whereas no significant associations were observed between anxiety and semen volume. Depression was not associated with any semen parameter. In adjusted regression models, higher perceived stress scores were independently associated with lower sperm concentration (β = −0.365; 95% CI: −0.680 to − 0.049; p = 0.024). Increasing age was associated with reduced semen volume (β = −0.007; 95% CI: −0.013 to − 0.002; p = 0.010). Higher perceived stress and anxiety were associated with sperm concentration among Ghanaian men seeking fertility care. Because of the cross-sectional design, causal direction cannot be established. The findings support consideration of psychological assessment within comprehensive infertility care.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1007/s42399-026-02628-w
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.