article · Frontiers in Political Science
Introduction This paper examines the extent to which NATO’s 2011 intervention in Libya contributed to the escalation of violent armed conflict in the Sahel, while accounting for the influence of state fragility, environmental scarcity, population size, and government effectiveness. Although existing scholarship has largely emphasised environmental drivers of Sahelian insecurity, the spillover mechanisms of external interventions remain underexplored. Methods Using panel data from 13 Sahelian states covering the period 2012 to 2024, the study applies a two-step System Generalized Method of Moments estimator and Method of Moments Quantile Regression (MMQR) to address endogeneity, capture persistence in conflict, and assess heterogeneity across conflict intensities. Results The findings show that NATO-related spillover effects significantly increase violent armed conflict, with stronger impacts in high-intensity contexts. State fragility also emerges consistently as a major driver of escalating violence, whereas environmental stressors do not exhibit a robust direct effect. Government effectiveness shows an unexpected positive association with violence. Discussion/Conclusion The study concludes that insecurity in the Sahel is better explained by the interaction between external shocks and entrenched domestic fragilities than by environmental pressures alone.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3389/fpos.2026.1763275
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.