article · South African Family Practice
BACKGROUND: Pre-eclampsia (PE) is a major contributing factor to high rates of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality in South Africa. Early diagnosis is currently a challenge. The objective is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of spot urine protein-creatinine (P/C) ratio (UPCR) in comparison with 24-h urine proteinuria assessment for predicting PE. METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional analytical study. A total of 125 women were included in the study and divided into normotensives (n = 25), early onset PE (n = 25), late onset PE (n = 25), chronic hypertension (n = 25) and gestational hypertension (n = 25) groups. Spot urine P/C ratio was determined in a mid-stream urine sample, and the 24-h urine protein was measured by standard laboratory techniques, and comparisons of the results were made between the groups. RESULTS: A significant difference was found in the spot protein-creatinine ratios (PCRs) between normotensives and early onset PE (p 0.0001) and between normotensives and late onset PE groups (p = 0.001). No significant differences were found between the 24-h urine and spot protein-creatinine across all groups: normotensives (p = 0.18); early onset PE (p = 0.63); late onset (p = 0.60); chronic hypertension (p = 0.43) and gestational hypertension (p = 0.95). In women with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), no statistical significance was noted between the 24-hour test and the spot PCR. CONCLUSION: Spot PCR is a reliable test for quantifying proteinuria in all pregnant women, as the results were similar to that of a 24-h urine proteinuria test regardless of their HIV status. This shows that the spot PCR yields accurate results. The 24-hour test is inconvenient for pregnant women with and without HIV and is also expensive and time-consuming.Contribution: The UPCR can be introduced as an additional gold standard of PE analysis, especially in outpatients.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.4102/safp.v68i1.6186
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.