article · The American Journal of Public Health
Urological pathologies exert profound effects on both the physiological integrity and psychological homeostasis of male patients, underscoring the critical necessity for integrating psychiatric support within standard urological practice. The present review investigates the psychosocial morbidity intrinsic to conditions such as prostate carcinoma and erectile dysfunction distress that is frequently exacerbated by entrenched normative masculine paradigms that actively deter health-seeking behaviors. Furthermore, this article elucidates the imperative for a biopsychosocial care model capable of concurrently managing somatic symptomatology and its associated psychological sequelae. Ultimately, the authors advocate for a systemic paradigm shift toward multidisciplinary, comprehensive care. By emphasizing the necessity of augmented psychosocial training for urological practitioners and the active deconstruction of societal stigmas, this framework aims to optimize clinical outcomes and establish an elevated standard of care in men's health. Keywords: Urological Pathologies, Physiological Integrity; Care in Men's Health.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.52338/tajoph.2026.5467
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.