MARATTO

article · Journal of Materials Science Materials in Engineering

Profitability analysis of developed briquette suitable for energy generation from residue of cattle feed sorghum stalk and groundnut husk

2026Open accessMekelle University

Abstract

The increasing demand for clean and affordable energy in developing countries highlights the need to utilize abundant agricultural residues through sustainable technologies. This study investigates the production, optimization, and economic feasibility of biomass briquettes developed from sorghum stalks and groundnut husks using cow dung as a natural binder. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was applied to evaluate the effects of particle size, binder proportion, and feedstock mixing ratio on key fuel properties, including density, shatter index, and calorific value. The optimized composite briquette exhibited a calorific value of 24.36 MJ·kg⁻1, density of 1.202 g·cm⁻3, and shatter index of 96.19%, outperforming single-feedstock briquettes. Proximate analysis revealed low moisture (3.16%), low ash (3.63%), and high volatile matter (≈80%), while ultimate analysis indicated favorable elemental composition with 51.56% carbon, 6.30% hydrogen, and negligible nitrogen and sulfur, suggesting low emission potential. Economic evaluation demonstrated strong investment viability, with a positive Net Present Value (NPV), a payback period of 2.25 years, and profitable break-even capacity under typical local market conditions. Overall, the findings confirm that sorghum stalk and groundnut husk residues can be efficiently converted into high-quality briquettes with promising economic returns, offering a sustainable alternative to traditional biomass fuels and contributing to improved energy security and environmental conservation in Ethiopia.

Research topics

  • Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
  • Iron and Steelmaking Processes

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1186/s40712-026-00427-8

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.