MARATTO

article · Industrial Technology Journal

Production of lightweight bricks using sustainable materials for saving energy in building constructions

Abstract

This study investigates the utilization of industrial waste, such as fly ash, to generate lightweight geopolymer concrete (LWGC), which is an environmentally beneficial alternative to typical Portland cement-based lightweight concrete (LWC). Six LWC and six LWGC mixtures were developed, cured, and evaluated for mechanical and physical parameters such as compressive strength, flexural strength, absorption, unit weight, fire resistance, and thermal conductivity. The results revealed that LWGC with 350 kg/m³ of fly ash produced the maximum compressive strength (29.7 MPa uncured, 35.3 MPa cured), exceeding LWC which attained 32.6 MPa. However, increasing polystyrene concentration in LWGC decreased strength. Both varieties have poor flexural strength, making them unsuitable for applications needing significant flexural resistance. LWC absorption rates were greater (up to 7.9%) than LWGC (up to 4.2%). Fire resistance and thermal conductivity tests showed that polystyrene-containing samples had greater insulating qualities, with a temperature differential of 8.75°C compared to 2.85°C for non-polystyrene samples. Overall, LWGC shows promise as a long-term building material with competitive mechanical and thermal performance. The cost research found that 1000 lightweight geopolymer bricks cost roughly 174.9 USD, whereas 1000 lightweight cement bricks cost around 52.1 USD. Geopolymer bricks are more than three times more expensive, but they give major environmental benefits such as lower CO2 emissions, higher fire resistance, and superior thermal insulation, making them a long-term viable solution.

Research topics

  • Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
  • Fire effects on concrete materials

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/itj.2025.368510.1023

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.