article · PLoS ONE
BACKGROUND: Re-laparotomy is one of the causes of morbidity and mortality among patients who have had abdominal surgery. Due to the unavailability of laparoscopic surgery in the region, laparotomy remains the standard treatment. As a result, re-laparotomy is commonly performed, significantly increasing the labor load, financial costs, and the risks of morbidity and mortality for patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence and factors associated with re-laparotomy procedures, in order to better understand their impact on patient health and healthcare resources. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on patients who underwent gastrointestinal procedures in a hospital in Ethiopia between September 2020 and August 2022. The association between independent variables with re-laparotomy (dependent variable) was analyzed using bi-variate and multivariate logistic regression. Those variables that had a p-value of less than 0.2 were put into a multivariate analysis. The strength of the association was displayed using crude and adjusted odds ratios with a 95% confidence interval. P-values less than 0.05 were used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 1276 charts were reviewed, and 127 (10%) of those were found to have re-laparotomy. A greater proportion of re-laparotomy was associated with the occurrence of prior abdominal surgery (AOR = 67.94, 95% CI: 39.07, 118.13), the existence of ischemic bowel during surgery (AOR = 4.36, 95% CI: 2.10, 9.02), and the intraoperative use of inotropic/vasopressor medications (AOR = 7.03, 95% CI: 2.52, 19.59). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of re-laparotomy was found to be 10% which is higher compared with some previous reports. Prior abdominal surgery, ischemic bowel presence during surgery, and the use of inotropic/vasopressor drugs intra-operatively were all found to be risk factors for re-laparotomy.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335304
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.