article · Brazilian Journal of Clinical Medicine and Review
Introduction: Arterial hypertension is a silent condition and one of the main risk factors for cardiovascular diseases.In Angola, although several studies have assessed its prevalence, results remain heterogeneous and inconsistent.Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the country. Material and Methods:A search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases, covering community and non-community studies that included adults and reported at least one outcome of interest.This systematic review with meta-analysis was previously registered on the PROSPERO platform.Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 software, and study heterogeneity was assessed through Cochran's Q test and the I statistic. Results:The search identified 400 studies, of which 12 met the inclusion criteria, totaling 54,137 participants.The overall prevalence of hypertension was 29.38% [95% CI: 24.29-35.04;p<0.0001], being slightly higher in men (29.58%) compared to women (25.60%).The proportion of individuals aware of their condition was 42.61% [95% CI: 32.99-52.82;p<0.0001].Among hypertensive patients, 40.42% were receiving treatment [95% CI: 27.48-54.85;p<0.0001], of whom only 36.90% had controlled blood pressure [95% CI: 30.79-43.46;p<0.0001].A significant difference was observed between community and non-community studies (p<0.0001), with control rates of 41.06% and 24.73%, respectively. Conclusion:The findings of this research highlight a high prevalence of arterial hypertension in Angola.More than half of participants were unaware of their condition, the proportion of individuals under treatment was relatively low, and nearly two-thirds had uncontrolled blood pressure.These results underscore the urgent need to implement more effective strategies for screening, health education, and expanding access to treatment.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.52600/2965-0968.bjcmr.2025.3.1.acch3
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.