MARATTO

article · Buildings

Prediction of Torque Capacity in Circular Concrete-Filled Double-Skin Tubular Members under Pure Torsion via Machine Learning and Shapley Additive Explanations Interpretation

20245 citationsOpen accessUniversity of South Africa

Abstract

The prediction of torque capacity in circular Concrete-Filled Double-Skin Tubular (CFDST) members under pure torsion is considered vital for structural design and analysis. In this study, torque capacity is predicted using machine learning (ML) algorithms, such as Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Random Forest (RF), and Decision Tree (DT), which are employed. The interpretation of the results is conducted using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAPs). The performance of these ML models is evaluated against two traditional analytical formulas that have been proposed and are available in the literature. Through comprehensive analysis, it is shown that superior predictive capabilities are possessed by the CatBoost and XGBoost models, characterized by high R2 values and minimal mean errors. Additionally, insights into the influence of input features are provided by SHAP interpretation, with an emphasis on key parameters such as concrete compressive strength and steel tube dimensions. The gap between empirical models and ML techniques is bridged by this study, offering engineers a more accurate and efficient tool for CFDST structural design. Significant implications for optimizing CFDST column designs and advancing structural engineering practices are presented by these findings. Directions for future research include the further refinement of ML models and the integration of probabilistic analyses for enhanced structural resilience. Overall, the transformative potential of ML and SHAP interpretation in advancing the field of structural engineering is showcased by this study.

Research topics

  • Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
  • Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
  • Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/buildings14041040

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.