article · Scientific Reports
Accurate prediction of the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of geopolymer-stabilized clayey soil is critical for geotechnical engineering. Conventional regression algorithms and even advanced machine learning approaches such as artificial neural networks often struggle to fully capture the highly non-linear interactions among soil properties and geopolymer mix parameters while maintaining computational efficiency and interpretability on limited datasets. To address these challenges, this investigation proposes a novel hybrid predictive framework based on a sector fruit fly optimization algorithm–enhanced extreme learning machine (SFOA-ELM) for improved UCS estimation. The model used 270 experimental records with 8 input variables (i.e., liquid limit, plasticity index, GGBS content, molarity). The baseline ELM achieved moderate performance (training R² = 0.9432, testing R² = 0.9054; RMSE = 1.55 MPa and 1.91 MPa, respectively). The predictive accuracy of the standard FOA-ELM improved to an R² of 0.9768 (training) and 0.9318 (testing), with RMSE values of 0.99 MPa (training) and 1.62 MPa (testing). The performance of the SFOA-ELM model improved to have excellent predictive performance with an R² value of 0.9775 (training) and 0.9446 (testing), and an RMSE value of 0.98 MPa (training) and 1.462 MPa (testing), respectively. The SFOA-ELM model reduced the testing MSE by 42% compared to ELM and by 19% compared to FOA-ELM. A SHAP analysis suggested that GGBS content, plasticity index and liquid limit were the most important for prediction. The statistical validations and residual analysis confirmed SFOA-ELM’s ability to generalize effectively and exhibit a tight distribution of errors. These findings show that the SFOA-ELM framework offers a robust, computationally efficient, and interpretable tool for geopolymer mix design and UCS prediction, providing practical decision-support for geotechnical engineering applications.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-47208-z
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.