article
This paper investigates the implementation of trussed designs in modular tendon-driven continuum arms (CAs) to address stiffness and stability limitations while maintaining adaptability. Various truss configurations-Single-Level, Combined-Level, and Alternated trusses-were analyzed using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) to evaluate their impact on flexural and axial stiffness under realistic loading conditions. Results demonstrate that truss placement significantly influences performance, with bottom-level trusses improving flexural stiffness by up to 33 %, middle-level trusses enhancing axial stiffness by 43%. Further, Combined-Level configurations provide superior overall stiffness, with Middle-Bottom trusses achieving a 66.5% improvement in flexural stiffness and a 70.9% increase in axial stiffness, while fully trussed configurations maximize rigidity with an 87.8% increase in flexural stiffness and 98.5% in axial stiffness. Alternated configurations achieve anisotropic stiffness for directional control. Additionally, the proposed trussed wing approach enhances stiffness programmability with reduced complexity, eliminating the need for full segment disassembly or tendon re-routing. The proposed trussed CAs enable tailored stiffness and directional control in robotics, medical devices, and aerospace systems.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1109/icca62237.2024.10927872
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.