article · Water Practice & Technology
ABSTRACT Direct measurement of evaporation at mining and industrial sites is highly accurate, but often prohibitively expensive, limiting its routine use in operational water balance modelling. This study evaluates a practical, cost-conscious approach for estimating daily evaporation using commonly applied empirical methods. Model performance was assessed by comparison with measured evaporation at both daily and aggregate scales. Among the methods tested, the Hargreaves equation provided a simpler yet sufficiently accurate alternative to the Penman–Monteith equation for operational applications. Sensitivity analysis showed that temperature is the dominant control on evaporation estimates for both methods, while solar radiation additionally influences Penman–Monteith estimates. Prioritising temperature and solar radiation measurements can substantially improve evaporation estimates where monitoring resources are limited. Local rainfall and wind measurements remain necessary to account for spatial variability and non-modelled losses. The results demonstrate that reliable evaporation estimates can be achieved using simplified empirical methods, supporting improved water balance assessments at mining and industrial sites where direct measurements are not feasible.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.2166/wpt.2026.210
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.