article · Business Strategy and the Environment
ABSTRACT We examine the drivers of sustainability reporting quality (QSR), conceptualised along two complementary dimensions, relevance and reliability, to assess how firm‐level attributes and institutional conditions jointly shape disclosure practices in the electricity sector. Using data from S&P Global Top 250, we find that stronger sustainability performance, the adoption of the Global Reporting Initiative framework, and the presence of institutional and foreign investors are positively associated with higher QSR. These underscore the importance of internal performance, established reporting frameworks, and market‐based mechanisms in enhancing the credibility and decision usefulness of sustainability reporting. In contrast, rule of law and carbon pricing policies exhibit negative associations with disclosure relevance, suggesting strategic opacity or compliance fatigue in more highly regulated environments. This study provides industry‐specific, cross‐national evidence from a critical yet underexplored sector. The findings offer timely insights for managers, regulators, investors and standard setters as mandatory sustainability reporting under IFRS S1 and S2 is implemented across jurisdictions.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1002/bse.70606
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.