MARATTO

article · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Potential of solar and wind-based green hydrogen production frameworks in African countries

In plain language

This study explores the potential for green hydrogen production in African countries using solar and wind energy to power water electrolysers. It estimates electricity and hydrogen production costs, carbon dioxide mitigation, and the levelised cost of hydrogen (LCOH) for each country by 2030. Findings indicate that solar-based hydrogen production generally surpasses wind-based production. The LCOH for solar systems ranges from $4.6 to $7.31 per kilogram, with Namibia and Egypt showing the lowest costs. For wind systems, LCOH ranges from $5.6 to over $20 per kilogram, with Cape Verde and Djibouti having the lowest. Significant LCOH reductions are projected by 2030 for both technologies. The research also identifies adsorption-based atmospheric water as a viable water source for arid regions.

Key takeaways

  • Hydrogen production from solar energy generally outweighs that from wind energy in African countries.
  • The levelised cost of hydrogen (LCOH) for solar-powered systems ranges from $4.6 to $7.31 per kilogram, while for wind-powered systems it ranges from $5.6 to over $20 per kilogram.
  • Namibia and Egypt show the lowest LCOH for solar-based hydrogen, at $4.6 and $4.64 per kilogram respectively.
  • Significant reductions in LCOH, up to 37% for solar and 25.23% for wind, are projected by 2030.
  • Solar-based hydrogen production offers higher carbon dioxide mitigation, ranging from 109.8 to 177.7 kg/m2, compared to wind-based production.

Why it matters

This research is important because it quantifies Africa's potential to produce green hydrogen using its abundant solar and wind resources. This could help meet the continent's growing energy demands, foster economic development, and significantly contribute to global carbon dioxide mitigation efforts, offering a sustainable energy pathway.

Commercialisation angle

This is early-stage research providing foundational data on the economic viability and environmental benefits of green hydrogen production in African countries. The cost estimations and CO2 mitigation figures could inform policy decisions, attract investment in renewable energy infrastructure, and guide the development of large-scale green hydrogen projects. The abstract does not indicate specific commercial products or immediate market applications.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Africa possesses a profusion of renewable energy resources that can address the continent's need for electricity to foster economic development and achieve international objectives for carbon dioxide mitigation. Green hydrogen stands out as promising among the plethora of available energy production, transportation, and storage technologies. The current study offers a general outlook on green hydrogen production utilizing solar and wind energies powering the water electrolyzers. This analysis estimates the electricity production and its production cost, hydrogen production and production cost, carbon dioxide mitigation, and estimation of the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) by 2030 in each African country. The results reveal that hydrogen production from solar energy outweighs that from wind. The minimum and maximum power consumption are 64.26–65.46 kWh/kgH2 for the PV/H2 system and 53.62–64.8 kWh/kgH2 for the WT/H2 system. Moreover, the LCOH ranges from 4.6 to 7.31 $/kg for the PV/H2 system and 5.6 to more than 20 $/kg for the WT/H2 system. Namibia and Egypt have significant LCOH of the PV/H2 system with 4.6 and 4.64 $/kg, while Cape Verde and Djibouti have remarkable LCOH of 5.6 and 6.37 $/kg of the WT/H2 system. The percentage reduction in LCOH is 25.23% for the WT/H2 system and 37% for the PV/H2 system due to adopting the 2030 cost scenario. Moreover, adsorption-based atmospheric water is considered a suitable solution for water supply in arid regions. Finally, the CO2 mitigation ranges from 109.8 to 177.7 kg/m2 for the PV/H2 and 0.1–50.4 kg/m2 for the WT/H2.

Research topics

  • Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
  • Energy and Environment Impacts

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.04.272

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.