article · Ain Shams Dental Journal
Aim: compare the post- operative pain associated with sealer-based obturation technique (SBO) using bioceramic sealer and a (CWC) obturation technique with a resin-based sealer. Materials and methods: two-arm randomized clinical trial with 2 parallel groups 20 patients each, after shaping the canals to a minimum dimension of 30/.04, except for a single middle mesial canal, which was shaped to 25/.04 patients randomly allocated into two groups based on the obturation material used. To ensure patient privacy, each name was replaced with a case number. Patients documented their pain on a 0–10 (VAS) at: 4 hours, one day, and two days after canal obturation. The pain score was recorded at its highest value three successive time points selected and then sorted. Data were presented as mean, standard deviation (SD), median, and interquartile range (IQR) values. They were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U and signed rank tests, respectively. The significance level was set at p<0.05 within all tests. Results: The two groups showed no significant difference. With higher pain score for CWC group. Conclusion: Within the restrictions of this study, both CWC with AH+ sealer with and sealer based obturation with Bio-C sealer showed no significant pain level.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.21608/asdj.2025.337339.1650
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.