article · Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Research
Objectives: This study was designed for preliminary phytochemical screening of Citrullus lanatus var. citroides fruit pulp secondary metabolites. In addition, the polyphenolic compounds of the methanolic extract (ME) and its n-butanol soluble fraction (n-BF) were analyzed, and the in vivo analgesic activity of the richest polyphenolic fraction was evaluated. Methods: TheMEwas phytochemically screened for various secondary metabolites. Moreover, ME and n-BF polyphenolic profiling was performed using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) against external standards. The analgesic activity of the polyphenolic rich fraction (n-BF) was evaluated in vivo using acetic acid-induced abdominal writhing and hot plate tests. Results: Preliminary phytochemical screening revealed the presence of carbohydrate and /or glycosides, flavonoids, saponins, tannins, and unsaturated sterols and /or triterpenes, while alkaloids and/or compounds containing nitrogenous bases, anthraquinones, cardiac glycosides, and coumarins were absent. HPLC polyphenolic profiling showed the tentative identification of 11 phenolic compounds in ME (19.6959%), including 6 phenolic acids and 5 flavonoids, with gallic acid and rutin being the major identified ones; respectively. As well as, 17 phenolic compounds were tentatively identified in the n-BF (75.0771%), including 10 phenolic acids with chlorogenic acid as the major identified one, and 7 flavonoids with naringenin as the major one.Then-BF showed significant peripheral and central analgesic activity in a dose-dependent manner (p < 0.05), with n-BF at a dose of 1000 mg/kg being the most potent. Conclusion: The present study revealed that the n-BF was highly rich in phenolic compounds. These phenolic compounds were reported for the first time in C. lanatus var. citroides. The n-BF showed significant analgesic activity which was evaluated for the first time for the plant.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.21608/aprh.2023.217966.1221
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.