article · Scientific African
ABSTRACT Pollen and bee venom harvesting technologies are increasingly adopted globally due to their products' use for health and income generation. However, our current understanding of the effects of pollen and venom trapping on honey quality remains incomplete. This study assessed the effects of pollen and bee venom harvesting technologies on physicochemical, nutritional and antioxidant properties of honey. A total of thirty-six honey samples were collected from untrapped (control), pollen and venom-trapped hives in Singida Region, central Tanzania, during dry (high) and wet (low) seasons. The results showed that pollen collection technology increased diastase and pH but reduced water content, while bee venom collection technology increased titratable acidity but decreased colour absorption. Moreover, both technologies increased the hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) content compared to control. Interestingly, both technologies increased honey fructose content, whereas the venom collection technology increased protein and glucose. Furthermore, pollen collection technology increased antioxidant activity in honey compared to the control, while venom collection increased flavonoid content. Honey harvested during the high (dry) season had significantly higher brix, diastase activity, glucose, vitamin C, fructose, and total flavonoid content than the low (wet) season. However, harvesting honey during the high season significantly reduced pH, water content, HMF, ash content, colour absorption, protein content, antioxidant activity, total phenolic content, and titratable acidity compared to the low season. Technology and season interacted to affect all measured physicochemical parameters, nutritional quality and antioxidant capacity, except honey ash content. In general, pollen and bee venom harvesting technologies improve honey quality through enhancing physicochemical, nutritional, and antioxidant properties.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2026.e03451
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.