MARATTO

article · F1000Research

Policy Brief: Ethical Governance for Healthcare Cybersecurity: A Protocol for Agentic Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

<ns7:p>Background Healthcare systems face escalating cyber threats that compromise patient safety and institutional resilience. While artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly deployed for intrusion detection and automated response, many systems remain reactive and insufficiently aligned with governance and regulatory standards. Methods This policy brief proposes a Governance Protocol for Ethical Agentic Artificial Intelligence in healthcare cybersecurity. The protocol articulates procedural and infrastructural principles for embedding ethical rule enforcement, explainability, regulatory alignment, and structured human oversight within autonomous AI decision loops. An operational illustration is provided through the Agentic Artificial Intelligence Framework (AAIF), developed using a Design Science Research methodology and evaluated in a simulated healthcare network environment using benchmark cybersecurity datasets. Results Evaluation across more than 280,000 healthcare-relevant network events demonstrated improvements in response time (34.8% reduction), recovery rate (41.6% increase), adaptability (27.5% improvement), and detection accuracy (96.8%). Governance metrics, including Ethical Compliance Rate (0.99), zero false escalations, and 35 ms decision latency, indicate that embedding governance constraints did not compromise technical performance. Conclusions Governance-embedded AI architectures can reconcile cybersecurity resilience with ethical accountability and regulatory coherence. Embedding governance as an architectural design condition rather than an external compliance layer offers a scalable pathway toward trustworthy digital health ecosystems, particularly in resource-constrained settings.</ns7:p>

Research topics

  • Information and Cyber Security
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.178567.1

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.