MARATTO

article · Journal of financial reporting & accounting

Pioneer Jones vs the modifiers: case of detecting accrual-based earnings management using advanced machine learning classifiers in an emerging economy

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential improvement in the intelligent classification of opportunistic accrual-based earnings management (AEM) using advanced machine learning (ML) algorithms by incorporating different Jones-based measures for the target variable, including the standard Jones (1991) model and its most-cited modifications; Dechow et al. (1995) and Kothari et al. (2005). Design/methodology/approach Using the design science research framework, the study examined the performance of ML algorithms in classifying the AEM in a sample of non-financial firms listed on the Egyptian Stock Exchange from 2016–2022. The classification models were developed with a set of financial features and three different sets of target variables. The paper uses three advanced ML classifiers, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Gradient Boosting and Random Forest to classify multi-class AEM. Findings Acknowledging a significant improvement in the detection accuracy, Kothari et al. (2005) demonstrated superior performance compared to earlier Jones-based models when used as an AEM target variable proxy in developing all ML classifiers, especially the XGBoost classifier. Originality/value This study significantly contributes to the field by establishing pioneering evidence for the most accurate measure of the AEM target variable among the most cited Jones-based models. This allows for the effective classification and prediction of AEM with higher precision using advanced ML classifiers.

Research topics

  • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
  • Credit Risk and Financial Regulations

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1108/jfra-12-2024-0902

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.