MARATTO

article · Analytica—A Journal of Analytical Chemistry and Chemical Analysis

Physicochemical Assessment of Selected Conductive Polymers for Probable Mercury Remediation in Wastewater—Experimental and DFT Approach

Abstract

Mercury contamination in aquatic environments poses significant risks to ecosystems and human health, underscoring the need for effective remediation technologies. This research examines the physicochemical properties of the synthesised polymer materials, and DFT calculations were used as an initial step for material development to validate our experimental outcomes for the prepared polymers: polyaniline (PANI), polyethersulfone (PES), and polyamidoamine (PAMAM). Furthermore, DFT studies were used to elucidate structure–property relationships in polymers, serving as performance predictors for mercury adsorption and selectivity, as well as for their applicability in electronic sensors. The characterisation techniques indicated the high functional group densities of PAMAM dendrimers for effective chelation, while the semi-crystalline structure of PANI improves metal binding. DFT calculations reveal that PAMAM exhibits the smallest HOMO–LUMO energy gap, indicating a high reactivity towards mercury ions. Binding energies indicate that PAMAM forms the most stable single-ion complex; PAM1Hg (0.242 eV, 23.37 kJ mol−1), whereas PES exhibits enhanced interaction at elevated mercury concentrations, resulting in stable multi-Hg complexes, PES3Hg (0.136 eV, 13.13 kJ/mol). The findings indicate that nitrogen-rich functional groups and aromatic systems play a crucial role in mercury binding, highlighting the promise of conductive polymers for creating effective adsorbents aimed at mercury remediation in industrial wastewater.

Research topics

  • Conducting polymers and applications
  • Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/analytica7030055

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.