article · BMC Ophthalmology
PURPOSE: Cataract and glaucoma, often coexist and present a surgical challenge requiring optimal visual and IOP outcomes. This study compared the clinical outcomes of phaco-trabeculectomy (PHACO-Trab) and manual small incision cataract surgery with trabeculectomy (MSICS-Trab) in patients with coexisting cataract and primary open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, interventional single-masked clinical trial enrolled 200 eyes from 122 patients with coexisting cataract and primary open-angle glaucoma. Patients were assigned to undergo either phacoemulsification with trabeculectomy (PHACO-Trab) or manual small incision cataract surgery with trabeculectomy (MSICS-Trab). At 24 weeks, 151 eyes from 92 patients completed follow-up and were analyzed (PHACO-Trab, n = 77; MSICS-Trab, n = 74). The primary outcome was change in intraocular pressure (IOP), while secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), postoperative complications, and reduction in antiglaucoma medications, assessed up to 24 weeks. Data was analyzed using SPSS v22; independent t-tests and chi-square tests compared continuous and categorical variables, respectively, while multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of surgical failure. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: Both PHACO-Trab and MSICS-Trab significantly improved BCVA and reduced IOP at 24 weeks. Mean BCVA was 0.414 logMAR (PHACO-Trab) vs. 0.523 logMAR (MSICS-Trab) (p = 0.187), and mean IOP dropped to 15.31 ± 6.28 mmHg and 14.38 ± 3.24 mmHg, respectively (p = 0.204). Complete surgical success was similar: 71.4% (PHACO-Trab) vs. 70.3% (MSICS-Trab) (p = 0.939). MSICS-Trab had significantly higher rates of hypotony (p = 0.043), posterior capsule opacification (p = 0.047), and surgically induced astigmatism (p < 0.0001). Refractive outcomes were more favorable in PHACO-Trab, with more eyes achieving target refraction (p = 0.021). Both groups showed significant reductions in the proportion of participants on antiglaucoma medications at endpoint. Independent predictors of surgical failure at 24 weeks were baseline IOP ≥ 21 mmHg (AOR 10.54, 95% CI 2.45-45.37; p = 0.002), worse visual field mean deviation (AOR 5.68, 95% CI 1.93-16.71; p = 0.002), and the presence of postoperative complications (AOR 2.59, 95% CI 1.11-6.08; p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Both phaco-trabeculectomy and MSICS-trabeculectomy improved visual and IOP outcomes in patients with coexisting cataract and glaucoma. PHACO-Trab showed better refractive results and fewer complications, while MSICS-Trab remains a cost-effective alternative. Within the limits of the sample size and 24-week follow-up, outcomes appeared broadly comparable. Surgical choice should consider patient profile, surgeon expertise, and resource availability. Larger multicenter studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06739343. REGISTRATION DATE: December 18, 2024 4:27 PM.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1186/s12886-025-04482-1
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.