MARATTO

article · Stats

Performance Evaluation of the Robust Stein Estimator in the Presence of Multicollinearity and Outliers

Abstract

Multicollinearity and outliers are common challenges in multiple linear regression, often adversely affecting the properties of least squares estimators. To address these issues, several robust estimators have been developed to handle multicollinearity and outliers individually or simultaneously. More recently, the robust Stein estimator (RSE) was introduced, which integrates shrinkage and robustness to effectively mitigate the impact of both multicollinearity and outliers. Despite its theoretical advantages, the finite-sample performance of this approach under multicollinearity and outliers remains underexplored. First, outliers in the y direction have been the main focus of earlier research on the RSE, not considering that leverage points could substantially impact regression results. Second, this study addresses the gap by considering outliers in the y direction and leverage points, providing a more thorough assessment of the RSE robustness. Finally, to extend the limited existing benchmark, we compare and evaluate the RSE performance with a wide range of robust and classical estimators. This extends existing benchmarking, which is limited in the current literature. Several Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were conducted, considering both normal and heavy-tailed error distributions, with sample sizes, multicollinearity levels, and outlier proportions varied. Performance was evaluated using bootstrap estimates of root mean squared error (RMSE) and bias. The MC simulation results indicated that the RSE outperformed other estimators under several scenarios where both multicollinearity and outliers are present. Finally, real data studies confirm the MC simulation results.

Research topics

  • Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/stats9010021

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.