MARATTO

peer review

Peer Review Report For: Health professionals’ perspectives on elective surgical cancellations in selected South African public hospitals: A study protocol [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]

In plain language

This study protocol outlines research into healthcare professionals' perspectives on elective surgical cancellations in selected South African public hospitals. The research aims to address a gap in existing literature, which has largely focused on quantifying cancellation rates and categorising causes using retrospective data. This study will employ a quantitative cross-sectional survey using structured questionnaires to identify and understand the factors contributing to theatre case cancellations from the viewpoint of frontline healthcare staff. A convenience non-probability sampling technique will be used to collect data from willing participants. Data analysis will involve using Microsoft Excel and STATA to compare descriptive and categorical data through frequencies, percentages, and graphical representations.

Key takeaways

  • The study will investigate healthcare professionals' perspectives on elective surgical cancellations in South African public hospitals.
  • It aims to identify factors contributing to theatre case cancellations from frontline staff's viewpoints.
  • A quantitative cross-sectional survey using structured questionnaires will be the primary data collection method.
  • Data analysis will involve descriptive and categorical comparisons using statistical software.
  • The research seeks to fill a gap in understanding systemic inefficiencies and resource limitations from a professional perspective.

Why it matters

Understanding why elective surgeries are cancelled from the perspective of healthcare professionals is crucial for improving the efficiency of surgical services. This insight can help identify systemic issues and resource limitations, ultimately leading to better operational performance, improved patient outcomes, and more effective use of healthcare resources.

Commercialisation angle

The abstract describes a study protocol focused on understanding systemic issues within public hospitals. It does not indicate an application pathway, specific product, or service for commercialisation.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

* The efficient functioning of surgical services in public hospitals is a cornerstone of effective healthcare delivery, influencing not only operational performance but also patient outcomes and the overall utilisation of resources within the health system. Elective surgical case cancellations represent a persistent and complex challenge faced by healthcare systems globally, often reflecting systemic inefficiencies and resource limitations. While existing research has predominantly focused on quantifying cancellation rates and categorising causes through retrospective institutional data, few studies have explored the insights of healthcare professionals, key frontline stakeholders who play a critical role in identifying and addressing cancellations. This study seeks to address this gap by examining healthcare professionals’ perspectives on elective surgical case cancellations within selected public hospitals in South Africa. This study will employ a quantitative cross-sectional survey to identify and understand the factors contributing to the cancellations of theatre cases from healthcare professionals’ perspectives. A convenience non-probability sampling technique will be utilised to collect data using a structured questionnaire from healthcare professionals who are readily available and willing to participate during the study period. Quantitative data analysis will involve entering survey data into Microsoft Excel 2021 for Windows and subsequently exporting it to STATA version 18.5 for advanced analysis. Descriptive and categorical data will be compared using frequencies, percentages, and graphical representations. Ethical clearance has been granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences at Walter Sisulu University, Ref: WSU HREC 051/2025. Approval to access the research sites has been obtained from both the Provincial Health Research Committees of the Eastern Cape (Ref: EC_202505_029) and Mpumalanga (Ref: MP_202506_003) departments. Results will be shared with key stakeholders through public presentations, conferences, and published in peer-reviewed journals.

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.5256/f1000research.202373.r410604

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.