MARATTO

article · American Journal of Food Science and Technology

Partially Replaced Gluten Biscuit: Nutritional and Consumer Acceptability

Abstract

Driven by a heightened awareness of health issues associated with gluten consumption, there is an increasing demand for gluten-free food products. This trend has been particularly pronounced due to the increasing prevalence of conditions such as Celiac disease and Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS), impacting millions of individuals globally. This study investigated the development of gluten-free biscuits using cassava, soybean, and sorghum flours to address the nutritional and consumer acceptability gaps in gluten-free products. The study also aimed to assess the sensory attributes and nutritional composition of gluten-free biscuits prepared from locally available and cost-effective flours. Sensory analysis revealed high consumer acceptability for gluten-free biscuits, particularly in taste, texture, and overall appeal, with scores averaging above 7 on a 9-point hedonic scale. Proximate analysis indicated that soybean-enriched biscuits contained 14.5% protein, significantly higher than the 8.2% found in wheat-based biscuits, while sorghum contributed 5.8% dietary fiber compared to 2.3% in the control. Cassava provided a carbohydrate content of 72.4%, ensuring energy density. The study’s findings shows the potential of leveraging underutilized crops to address health concerns, reduce reliance on wheat flour, and promote agricultural sustainability. This research offers a practical framework for creating nutritious and desirable gluten-free biscuits that cater to evolving dietary preferences and promote inclusivity in food production.

Research topics

  • Food composition and properties
  • Seed and Plant Biochemistry
  • Celiac Disease Research and Management

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.54536/ajfst.v5i1.6040

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.