MARATTO

preprint

Parallel evolution in mosquito vectors – a duplicated esterase locus is associated with resistance to pirimiphos-methyl in <i>An. gambiae</i>

20245 citationsOpen accessUniversité d'Abomey-Calavi

Abstract

Abstract The primary control methods for the African malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae , are based on insecticidal interventions. Emerging resistance to these compounds is therefore of major concern to malaria control programmes. The organophosphate, pirimiphos-methyl, is a relatively new chemical in the vector control armoury but is now widely used in indoor residual spray campaigns. Whilst generally effective, phenotypic resistance has developed in some areas in malaria vectors. Here, we used a population genomic approach to identify novel mechanisms of resistance to pirimiphos-methyl in Anopheles gambiae s . l mosquitoes. In multiple populations, we found large and repeated signals of selection at a locus containing a cluster of detoxification enzymes, some of whose orthologs are known to confer resistance to organophosphates in Culex pipiens . Close examination revealed a pair of alpha-esterases, Coeae1f and Coeae2f , and a complex and diverse pattern of haplotypes under selection in An. gambiae, An. coluzzii and An. arabiensis . As in Cx. pipiens , copy number variation seems to play a role in the evolution of insecticide resistance at this locus. We used diplotype clustering to examine whether these signals arise from parallel evolution or adaptive introgression. Using whole-genome sequenced phenotyped samples, we found that in West Africa, a copy number variant in Anopheles gambiae is associated with resistance to pirimiphos-methyl. Overall, we demonstrate a striking example of contemporary parallel evolution which has important implications for malaria control programmes.

Research topics

  • Malaria Research and Control
  • Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Insect Resistance and Genetics

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.01.578361

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.