MARATTO

article · Abstracts

P-126 Was telework during COVID-19 pandemic, suitable for everyone?

Abstract

<h3>Introduction</h3> The use of telework was strongly recommended by the World Health Organisation during the COVID-19 pandemic. It may have, in addition to advantages, psycho-social repercussions on workers. The aim of this study was to describe the psychosocial impact of telework during the era of quarantine related to the first pandemic wave of COVID-19. <h3>Materials and Methods</h3> Descriptive cross-sectional study including Tunisian workers who teleremoted during the first health lockdown of 2020. Data was collected using a self-administered online questionnaire specifying the occupational and psychosocial characteristics of telework. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 612 teleworkers were included. The mean age was 33±6.9 years. Sex ratio (M/F) was 0.32. Teleworking had been practiced before the health confinement by 55.6% of the cases and 86.3% had never received teleworking training. Psychosocial repercussions were noticed among 92.2%. An increase in working time was reported by 47.1%, significantly more reported by those in managerial positions (44.7%). During breaks, 48% were spending time watching TV or on social networks, which is an activity significantly correlated with sadness, chronic anxiety and sleep disorders. For benefits perceived, 85% appreciated the absence of constraints related to workplace path and 61.8% the autonomy. Telework was suitable for work according to 90.8%. Desire to continue teleworkins was expressed in 89.9%. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The teleworking was appreciated but it had psychosocial negative repercussions. A new working mode is spreading and showing possibility to work in a different manner with similar or better results. The occupational physician will manage emergent health risk factors.

Research topics

  • Healthcare Systems and Public Health

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1136/oem-2023-epicoh.219

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.