MARATTO

article · Journal of the Colleges of Medicine of South Africa

Outcomes of non-operative management of liver trauma in a low- and middle-income country: A single-centre experience from South Africa

Abstract

Background: Non-operative management (NOM) has become the standard of care for haemodynamically stable patients with liver trauma, yet robust data from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain scarce, particularly in settings with a high burden of penetrating trauma. Methods: This single-centre retrospective cohort study analysed 251 adult patients with liver injuries managed non-operatively at a major trauma centre in Johannesburg, South Africa, between January 2017 and December 2023. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day survival and associated injury patterns. Results: Overall mortality was 1.20% (3/251; Wilson 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41–3.45). All deaths occurred within 30 days. Admission lactate was the only variable significantly associated with mortality in the univariate analysis (odds ratio [OR]: 1.53 per 1 mmol/L increase, 95% CI: 1.11–2.10, p = 0.009). Sensitivity analysis using Firth’s penalised logistic regression yielded consistent results (penalised OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.08–2.03, p = 0.015). The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) liver injury grade showed no association with mortality. Chest injuries were the most common associated injury (42.6%). Associated injury patterns were consistent across Grades III–V. Conclusion: In appropriately selected haemodynamically stable patients, NOM achieved excellent outcomes despite a substantial polytrauma burden. Physiology, rather than anatomic grade or associated injury pattern, determined survival. These findings support physiology-led selection in resource-constrained environments. Contribution: This study provides key insights into the real-world outcomes of non-operative management (NOM) of liver trauma in a high-volume, resource-constrained South African trauma centre. It demonstrates exceptionally low mortality (1.20%) with physiology-led patient selection despite a high burden of penetrating trauma and polytrauma. The primary contribution is evidence that admission lactate is a strong predictor of mortality, while anatomic injury grade (AAST) is not. These findings reinforce physiology-guided decision-making in LMIC settings and align directly with the journal’s focus on clinical practice and surgical outcomes in Southern Africa.

Research topics

  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Abdominal Trauma and Injuries
  • Trauma Management and Diagnosis

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4102/jcmsa.v4i1.422

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.