MARATTO

article · Clinical Dermatology Review

Oral Finasteride (5 mg and 2 mg) versus Topical Minoxidil 5% in Female Pattern Hair Loss

2025Open accessAlexandria University

Abstract

Background: Female pattern hair loss (FPHL) has a negative psychological and social impact. Lacks of consensus for its treatment as well as inconsistent response to treatment modalities are considered major challenges for physicians. Objectives: To assess the safety and efficacy of oral finasteride 5 mg and 2 mg versus topical minoxidil 5% in FPHL both clinically and by trichoscopy. Patients and Methods: Forty-five females with FPHL were included in the study for 6-month duration. Fifteen patients in Group A received oral finasteride 5 mg daily, 15 patients in Group B received oral finasteride 2 mg daily, and 15 patients in Group C were treated with topical minoxidil 5% solution. Assessment was done using Sinclair scale, photography, trichoscopy, degree of improvement, and patient satisfaction scale. Results: Significant improvement of Sinclair scale, hair density, and yellow dots in each group was noted along the treatment period; however, no further improvement of hair density in Group B after the 3 rd month was detected. There was significant higher improvement in the hair density in Group A and C than Group B. The degree of improvement and patient satisfaction were significantly greater in Group A and C than Group B. A negative correlation between degree of improvement and patient’s age was observed in Group B. Conclusion: Oral finasteride 5 mg and topical minoxidil 5% gave comparable results in FPHL, yet both provided greater and maintained response than 2 mg finasteride. In addition, low-dose finasteride gave better responses in the younger age group. However, all three treatment options were safe in the treatment of FPHL.

Research topics

  • Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Nail Diseases and Treatments

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4103/cdr.cdr_87_24

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.