MARATTO

article

Optimizing Specimen Geometry for Improved Splitting Tensile Test Performance: A Numerical Investigation

Abstract

Due to the difficulty of conducting direct tensile tests on specimens, scientific study suggested the performance of indirect tensile tests, specifically, tensile tests by splitting or tests by flexing. These tests are performed according to well-defined standards, there are three types of specimen shapes used: cubic, cylindrical and prismatic. Through this study, a new geometry was proposed to minimize the volume of the specimens while ensuring adequate results. Using test specimens of different shapes, a simulation of the splitting tensile test was performed. The application of a compressive force along two diametrically opposing generating planes constitutes the splitting tensile test. The compressive force generates a perpendicular tensile force that provides the resistance to splitting tensile forces. The outcomes of this research reveal that the specimen size relatively affects the tensile strength. Compared to the other specimens, it was discovered that the tiny specimens had higher tensile strength. In comparison to the results of the cubic and cylindrical specimens, the performance of the proposed model is often better. These findings show that this specimen is suitable for use due to the convergence of the experimental measurements.

Research topics

  • Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
  • Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
  • Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1109/iccsc62074.2024.10616925

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.