MARATTO

article

Optimizing Photovoltaic Performance: A Comparative Analysis of XGBoost and Gradient Boosting for MPPT

Abstract

This work compares Gradient Boosting Regression (GBR) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) for MPPT in PV systems. Both models were implemented and trained with three years of temperature and irradiance data available at NASA to predict the optimal maximum power point voltage (Vmp). The models developed were put to the test in MATLAB/Simulink. Experimental results showed that GBR achieved a power conversion efficiency of 95.7% under AM 1.5 irradiance (1000 W/m<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>), which was much higher than XGBoost of 73.5%.In addition, the accuracy of GBR was better than that of XGBoost (MAE = 0.18888) and presented higher robustness and more rapid convergence speed in the rapid fluctuation of irradiance. These results demonstrate the performance of GBR in real-time MPPT and the benefits of using ensemble learning strategies in intelligent solar energy harvesting.

Research topics

  • Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
  • Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
  • Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1109/icesa66763.2025.11280867

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.