article · Nanomaterials
As the demand for sustainable construction materials grows, wood ash and nanosilica have emerged as promising components for eco-friendly mortars, whose optimization requires advanced analytical techniques capable of capturing their complex linear and nonlinear interactions, making frameworks such as response surface methodology and artificial neural networks essential for effective mix design. This study examines the mechanical performance of eco-friendly mortar incorporating wood ash (WA) as a partial cement replacement and nanosilica solution (NSS) as a strength-enhancing additive, with the aim of optimizing compressive and flexural behaviour. Wood ash was substituted at levels of 5–25%, while NS (0.265 moL−1) was substituted at levels of 0–1.7%. Twenty-one mortar samples were produced and tested at multiple curing ages. Two modelling techniques, response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural networks (ANNs), were employed to evaluate the individual and interactive effects of WA and NSS on strength development at curing ages of 28 and 180 days. While RSM provided insight into factor significance and linear interactions, ANN more effectively captured nonlinear behaviour, achieving superior predictive accuracy (R2 = 1.000 for 28-day strength). Experimental results revealed that nanosilica substantially enhanced strength up to an optimal dosage of approximately 2.5 g, beyond which performance declined due to particle agglomeration or matrix over-refinement. In contrast, higher WA contents produced strength reductions attributable to dilution effects. Optimization showed that mixtures containing low WA (≤30 g) combined with moderate NSS (2.0–2.5 g) exhibited the highest mechanical performance. Collectively, the findings confirm that ANN-based models outperform RSM and multilinear regression, underscoring their effectiveness for mix design optimization and performance forecasting in sustainable cementitious systems.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/nano16120717
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.